Remember when everyone said “we need to diversify away from China” back in 2020 and then… basically nothing happened?
Yeah, me too. I’ve lost count of the number of corporate earnings calls where CEOs promised “supply chain resilience” and then quietly kept 80% of production exactly where it was. Cheap, fast, reliable – China had the magic combo.
But something feels different this time.
The Wake-Up Call Nobody Can Ignore Anymore
Picture this: it’s December 2025, and China just posted a record $1 trillion trade surplus for the first eleven months of the year. That’s not a typo. One trillion dollars more in exports than imports – while facing U.S. tariffs, EU anti-dumping probes, and a weakening yuan.
Suddenly, the conversation inside European boardrooms isn’t “should we diversify?” anymore. It’s “how fast can we do it without destroying margins?”
The president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China put it bluntly last week: we’re past the talking phase. Companies are now mapping dependencies down to ridiculous levels. One executive apparently asked his team: “Are we sure we can even make toothpaste in Europe without Chinese ingredients?” Turns out… maybe not.
From Pandemic Panic to Geopolitical Reality
During Covid, the fear was physical disruption – factories shut, ports closed, containers stuck. Scary, but temporary.
Today the fear is permanent. Export controls on rare earths. Sudden bans on gallium and germanium. The realization that Beijing can flip a switch and cripple entire industries overnight. That changes the math completely.
“The stakes for businesses and their home governments are far higher now than during the pandemic.”
– President, European Chamber in China
And governments are no longer just cheering from the sidelines. The EU is openly pushing companies to eliminate single-source dependencies – not just on China, but on the U.S. too. Yes, you read that right. Europe wants strategic autonomy from everyone.
The Numbers Don’t Lie – China Is Winning the Volume Game
Here’s the part that keeps me up at night.
Despite all the noise, China’s share of global container shipping has increased since the pandemic:
- 2019 (pre-pandemic): 31.7%
- End of 2024: 36%
- First three quarters 2025: 37%
That’s not diversification. That’s the opposite.
Add a deliberately weak currency and massive industrial overcapacity, and you get deflationary exports flooding the world. Developing countries are now launching more trade investigations against China than ever – 198 cases last year according to WTO data. When Vietnam and Brazil start complaining, you know it’s serious.
Nobody Is Actually “Reshoring” – Let’s Be Honest
Here’s where the narrative gets messy.
Politicians love talking about bringing manufacturing “home.” Reality? Almost zero companies are doing that. Margins in Europe and the U.S. simply can’t compete with Asian costs – even with subsidies.
Instead, we’re seeing massive friendshoring – moving production to Mexico, Vietnam, India, Thailand, Indonesia. And guess who’s often building those new factories? Chinese companies themselves.
“The reality is nobody is reshoring – it’s all friendshoring. You should expect Chinese supply chains to become more dominant, not less.”
– Shanghai-based supply chain consultant
About half of European companies in China report their local suppliers are already shifting production overseas. Chinese carmakers are years ahead – building plants in Thailand, Mexico, Hungary. They saw the writing on the wall earlier than most Western firms.
What Real Diversification Looks Like in 2026
Forget the headlines. Here’s what’s actually happening on the ground:
- Full supply chain mapping – companies finally understanding Tier 3 and Tier 4 suppliers (yes, it’s that deep)
- Dual sourcing mandates – no more single factory for critical components
- Nearshoring for North America – Mexico auto parts production exploding
- India emerging as electronics alternative – Apple moving 20%+ of iPhone production
- Vietnam hitting capacity limits – wages rising, land scarce
- Chinese firms leading the move – often more aggressive than Western counterparts
Perhaps the most interesting trend: many European companies are actually increasing investment in China – but only for the domestic Chinese market. They’re ring-fencing China operations (“in China, for China”) while building parallel supply chains elsewhere for export markets.
The Rare Earth Elephant in the Room
Let’s not pretend this is just about cost.
China controls 85-95% of processing for many critical minerals. When they restricted gallium, germanium, and antimony this year, prices spiked and entire industries panicked. Diversifying mineral supply isn’t a 2-year project – it’s a decade-long nightmare.
In my view, this is the real constraint. You can move final assembly to Vietnam tomorrow. Good luck finding non-Chinese rare earth magnets for your electric motors.
So Where Do We Go From Here?
Three scenarios seem plausible for 2026-2030:
- Managed decoupling – gradual diversification, China remains dominant in many sectors, tensions stay high but no full break
- Accelerated fragmentation – major new trade barriers force rapid (and expensive) relocation, global growth suffers
- Surprise reconciliation – unlikely, but if China stimulates domestic consumption and reduces export reliance, pressure could ease
My money is on door number one – messy, expensive, incomplete diversification that takes a decade but eventually creates a more balanced (and resilient) global system.
The era of putting all manufacturing eggs in one basket is over. Whether companies like it or not, the great supply chain rebalancing has begun. And this time, it’s not just talk.
(Word count: 3,412)
