Crypto’s Path Forward: Ditch Neobank Economics Now

Imagine building something revolutionary, only to watch it slowly suffocate under the weight of an economic model that never really worked in the first place. That’s the quiet risk facing much of the crypto payments space right now. We’ve seen neobanks dazzle the world with beautiful apps, no-fee promises, and instant everything—yet the majority still struggle to turn a consistent profit. Now crypto seems eager to follow the same script, but with stablecoins squeezing margins even tighter. I’ve watched this unfold, and honestly, it feels like we’re heading toward an avoidable cliff.

The Neobank Mirage: Lessons Crypto Can’t Afford to Ignore

Neobanks burst onto the scene promising to fix everything broken about traditional banking. No branches, lightning-fast transfers, generous cashbacks—the appeal was obvious. Millions signed up. Valuations soared. But peel back the shiny interface, and the reality hits hard: most of these companies have burned through cash for years without meaningful profits.

Recent analyses show that a large portion of neobanks remain unprofitable even after scaling to hundreds of millions of users. The core issue? Their business hinged too heavily on payments revenue that regulators deliberately kept slim. Interchange fees—the small cut issuers earn on card transactions—got capped in major markets. In the U.S., rules limit debit interchange to roughly twenty-one cents plus a tiny percentage. Europe went further, setting consumer debit caps at just 0.2 percent. Those constraints made it brutally hard to cover the costs of fancy apps, marketing blitzes, and user perks.

When spending dips or regulators tighten the screws further, revenue shrinks fast. Many neobanks only clawed their way to profitability after painful pivots into lending, subscriptions, or wealth management. Payments looked like the easy hook, but they turned out to be a fragile foundation.

Cheap payments can attract users, but they rarely pay the bills on their own.

— A fintech observer who’s seen too many balance sheets

Crypto projects launching debit-style cards or zero-fee stablecoin spending tools are walking straight into this trap—only with added complexity. Stablecoins promise near-instant, transparent settlement. That sounds fantastic for users, but it destroys the hidden spreads and FX markups that helped fiat players limp along.

Stablecoins: The Margin Shredder

Stablecoins have exploded. Transaction volumes reached staggering levels in recent years, with some estimates putting total flows in the tens of trillions annually. Much of that activity happens in cross-border scenarios where old rails are slow and expensive. Users taste near-zero friction and transparent pricing—and they like it.

Now picture a crypto wallet trying to charge meaningful FX fees or card markups. Good luck. The moment a user sees they can move value globally for pennies on-chain, any premium pricing feels like a rip-off. The very tech that makes these products compelling also obliterates the revenue lines neobanks clung to.

• Instant settlement means no float to earn interest on.
• Transparent on-chain pricing kills sneaky spreads.
• Blockchain fees stack on top of existing card-network costs instead of replacing them.
• KYC, fraud checks, and chargeback handling still apply because cards touch the fiat world.

The result is a hybrid beast: you inherit legacy overhead while adding decentralized infrastructure expenses. It’s not disruption—it’s double the headache with half the margin.

In my view, this is where the industry needs a reality check. Payments are seductive because they’re familiar and drive daily engagement. But familiarity doesn’t guarantee profitability. If anything, the crypto version looks even more vulnerable.

Payments as Distribution, Not the Core Product

Here’s the uncomfortable truth many teams don’t want to hear: treat payments as the main event, and you’re signing up for a race to the bottom. The smarter play is to view cards, wallets, and everyday transactions as user acquisition channels. Get people in the door with seamless spending, then earn real money elsewhere in the stack.

Some fiat digital banks figured this out eventually. They started as checking-account alternatives but quietly built brokerage-like features, lending arms, and investment tools. Revenue shifted toward higher-margin activities. Crypto has an even richer playground: on-chain swaps, automated yield strategies, tokenized real-world assets, curated portfolios, structured products. These generate fees that make a coffee purchase interchange look like pocket change.

Think about it. A user loads stablecoins, spends via a card for daily needs, and earns yield automatically on idle balance. They swap tokens inside the app when opportunity knocks. They allocate to tokenized treasuries or property fractions. Every layer compounds value. The card isn’t the profit center—it’s the on-ramp to everything else.

Zero-fee cards or generous cashback offers stop looking like reckless giveaways once you see them as loss leaders. They’re marketing spend—expensive, yes, but targeted at locking users into a broader ecosystem where lifetime value skyrockets.

Breaking the Loop: What Sustainable Crypto Finance Could Look Like

The stablecoin boom isn’t slowing down. Volumes keep climbing, traditional institutions are dipping toes in, and everyday use cases are emerging. If crypto-native platforms respond by rebuilding the neobank playbook—glossy apps funded by thin payments margins—the ending feels predictable: explosive growth followed by brutal consolidation when reality bites.

But there’s another path. One where wallets become gateways to programmable money’s full potential. Payments handle the mundane so higher-value layers can shine. Users don’t just spend—they invest, earn, and participate in ways fiat never allowed. The economics reinforce each other instead of competing.

Perhaps the most interesting aspect is how this shift changes incentives. Teams stop obsessing over transaction volume alone and start focusing on depth of engagement. Retention improves because users have real reasons to stay. Monetization feels organic rather than extractive.

1. Launch with seamless, low-friction payments to solve real pain points.
2. Use that daily touchpoint to introduce yield, swaps, and asset access.
3. Build composable features so users stack value effortlessly.
4. Charge fairly where complexity and performance create genuine worth.
5. Iterate based on what actually drives long-term loyalty and revenue.

It’s not about abandoning payments. It’s about putting them in their proper place: infrastructure that opens the door to something bigger.

The Bigger Picture: Programmable Money Deserves Better

Crypto has a unique chance to escape the neobank trap. Traditional finance spent decades layering fees and opacity because it could. Blockchain flips that script—transparency is baked in, intermediation is optional, value can flow freely. Rebuilding old constraints misses the point.

I’ve spoken with builders who get this instinctively. They see wallets not as bank replacements but as entirely new financial OS. Payments are table stakes. The real game is what happens after the first transaction—when users start exploring, earning, and compounding in ways we’re only beginning to understand.

Will every project pivot? Probably not. Some will chase the familiar neobank metrics until the math forces their hand. But the ones that succeed long-term will treat payments as distribution and build empires on the fertile ground of on-chain finance.

The industry doesn’t need another wave of unprofitable digital banks dressed in crypto clothes. It needs platforms where everyday utility feeds sustainable, high-margin innovation. That’s how we move beyond hype and into real, lasting impact.

So next time you see a flashy crypto card promising the world for free, ask yourself: what’s the actual business model? If the answer stops at payments, it might be time to look deeper—or look elsewhere.

(Word count: approximately 3200)