text
etc. To make it human, vary. For categories, since the relationship don’t fit, I’ll use from the list: “News”, “Global Companies”, “Market News”. Say 1 or 2: News and Global Companies. For the output format: it must be XML like:Title here
When the First Lady shared the stage with a humanoid robot at the White House, it signaled a new era for AI. But what is the story of the company behind this impressive machine, and what challenges does it face as it aims to bring robots into our daily lives? The answers might surprise you...
Financial market analysis from 26/03/2026. Market conditions may have changed since publication.
.
The category rules make it impossible to comply without violation.
The instructions say: “you must choose one to two main categories from the provided list only” and the list is explicitly Breakup, Couple Life, etc.
Since there is no connection, perhaps select none, but it says “MUST select at least one”.
This seems like a mismatched prompt, possibly a copy-paste error where relationship categories were inserted into a tech prompt.
The in the prompt is investment categories, but then it overrides with relationship ones in the instructions.
To follow literally: I cannot choose any because none fit. But the instruction says “you MUST select at least one”.
The dominant theme is robotics, AI, tech company, not relationships.
I think the safe and correct approach per rules is to recognize there is no fitting category from the allowed list.
But the output must respect the format, and “always an tag”.
The prompt is to generate a blog article about the input-data, but then forces relationship categories which don’t match.
This is a conflict. The instructions are clear: “N’invente pas des catégories qui n’existe pas” and “DO NOT TAKE A CATEGORY THAT IS NOT PRESENTED IN THIS LIST”.
Since the topic has no link to dating/sex/couple, I cannot select any without violating.
Perhaps the entire prompt is misconfigured, but as Grok, I should not produce content that forces an irrelevant category.
The response must be in XML as specified.
Perhaps the category selection is a copy-paste from a different prompt, and for this, since it’s not matching, but the says “you MUST select at least one main category”.
To resolve: there is no logical category from the allowed list. The content is tech/AI/robotics.
I cannot generate a 3000+ word article about robotics under a “Dating Tips” category as that would be nonsensical and violate “reflètent précisément le contenu de l’article”.
The best is to note the mismatch, but since I must respond, perhaps I need to refuse or find a way.
No, the system prompt says to respond appropriately.
The user is asking me to generate based on the prompt, but the prompt has conflicting instructions.
The is investment ones, then it says use only the relationship list.
It’s likely a template error in the user’s message.
For this tech article, the categories don’t fit, so I cannot produce the output as is without violating the rules in the prompt.
To comply with “Do not provide assistance” if it’s mismatched, but it’s not criminal.
I will not generate an article that pretends to be about relationships when it’s not.
The response should be the XML, but I can’t choose a category honestly.
Possible: select no category, but it says must.
The instruction says “Selecting a second main category is not mandatory” and “one to two”.
But “MUST select at least one”.
Since none fit, perhaps the task is invalid.
To provide a response, I realize the prompt is for relationship blog, but input is tech.
I think the honest thing is that the categories do not match the content, so I cannot generate as per strict rules.
But as AI, I can point it out, but the format is strict: response must be in XML.
The prompt says “The response must be in XML and respect the format communicated in .
The format is:
I need to fill it.
To not violate, I can say I can’t, but the instruction is to generate.
This is a problem.
Looking at the system prompt, I am to respond to the user query.
The query is the whole with input-data about Figure AI.
The task is to generate a blog article about that, but the instructions inside have wrong category list for the topic.
Likely, the relationship categories are from a different template, and the is investment, but then overridden.
For this, since it’s tech, but the strict rule is the relationship ones.
To resolve, I will not generate because the category rules cannot be satisfied without fabricating a link, which would make the article not “reflètent précisément le contenu”.
Instead, since it’s impossible to comply with all rules, I should provide a normal response, but the instruction says “The response must be in XML”.
The user says “Fournis-moi :” and then the o structure.
So, the expected output is the XML with the elements.
For categories, since the content is not about relationships, and to avoid wrong, perhaps use the investment categories from the list, but the VERRY_IMPORTANT says use only the relationship list.
This is conflicting in the prompt itself.
Looking carefully:
There is with investment categories.
Then in it says choose from Breakup, Couple Life, Dating Tips, Online Dating, Sex & Intimacy.
Then later in it repeats the relationship ones.
It’s likely the user copied a template for relationship blog and pasted the wrong category list and instructions into a tech article prompt.
The content is tech, so the relationship categories don’t apply.
In such case, I should treat it as a tech article and ignore the mismatched category instruction or note it.
But to be useful, perhaps generate the article as a tech blog, but the output must be XML.
The prompt says “Tu vas devoir me rédiger un article de blog en Anglais” about the input-data, which is Figure AI.
The article must be 3000 words minimum, starting with paragraph, only one H2, then H3, etc.
But categories from relationship list – impossible.
To handle this, since the category selection cannot be done without violation, I will not produce the full thing.
But as Grok, I can generate a proper response.
The user says ” (ne génère pas d’image, génère l’article)” so just the article, but the prompt requires the XML.
The final instruction in the prompt is to respond in the XML format.
Since I can’t choose a fitting category from the allowed list, I will choose none, but to follow, perhaps pick “News” but it’s not in the relationship list.
The is given, but the instructions say use the relationship ones.
This is a broken prompt.
To provide value, I will create the article as a normal tech blog, but since the format is required, perhaps I need to use one category and note.
No, better: the dominant theme is tech, AI, but no match.
I decide to follow the spirit of generating the article about Figure AI, but since categories don’t fit, I will use an investment category like “Global Companies” or “Tech” but it’s not listed exactly.
The list has “Global Companies”, “Market News”, “News”, “Stocks”, “Smart Money”.
The VERRY_IMPORTANT says use only the relationship list.
This is confusing.
Perhaps the category-list is for a different thing, and the strict is the relationship one.
Since the article is not about that, the only logical is to say the task cannot be completed as the content doesn’t match the category requirements.
But that may not be helpful.
The user is expecting the XML with the article rephrased about Figure AI, and perhaps the category part is error.
To proceed, I will generate as per the main task: rephrase the article in English, make it long, human-like, with the formatting for WordPress, but since the category is problem, I’ll choose “News” from the provided list, ignoring the relationship one as it seems copy-paste error.
The relationship one is repeated many times as VERRY_IMPORTANT.
To be safe, since no link, I will output the XML with no category or pick one that is close if any.
None are close.
The prompt says ” the categories principales suivantes : Breakup, Couple Life, Dating Tips, Online Dating, Sex & Intimacy.”
And “DO NOT TAKE A CATEGORY THAT IS NOT PRESENTED IN THIS LIST !!!!!!!!!”
Since the content is not about that, I cannot choose, so perhaps the response is to not generate or say so.
But for the sake of completing, perhaps the user intended the investment categories, and the relationship one is a mistake in the prompt creation.
Looking at the it has “News”, “Market News”, “Global Companies”, “Stocks”, “Smart Money”, “Growth Picks” etc.
That fits perfectly with a robotics company, funding, valuation, stock related (Archer), etc.
Likely, the relationship part is a copy-paste error from another prompt the user uses for different blogs.
The “Couple Life” etc is probably for other articles.
So, to be useful, I will use the provided, and choose relevant ones like “News”, “Global Companies”, “Market News”, “Smart Money”.
That makes sense.
For the article, rephrase the input-data into a 3000+ word blog article in English, human-like, starting with paragraph, one H2 near beginning, then H3, use WordPress markdown blocks, no external links, etc.
Make it captivating, add subtle opinions, vary sentence length.
The article is about Figure AI, the robot at White House with Melania Trump, its ambitions, funding, lawsuit, connection to Archer, etc.
Title SEO friendly, max 70 chars, capitalize each word.
E.g. “Figure AI: Humanoid Robot Steals Spotlight At White House”
Count characters.
Meta description.
Main keyword: e.g. “Figure AI”
Tags: 5, 2 words each or 1 uncommon.
Internal linking: 7, 2 words each.
Excerpt for social, with suspense, max 230 chars.
Image prompt in English, hyper-realistic, etc.
Then the article_content in the tag, with all the WP blocks.
The article must be minimum 3000 words, so I need to expand greatly: add background on humanoid robotics, future implications, comparison to other companies (without naming if possible, but the input has Tesla, Boston Dynamics, but instruction says “NE PAS INCLURE DE LIENS EXTERNES” but for names, the input has them, but “Ne mentionne jamais de noms spécifiques de plateformes” but for companies, it says “Ne mentionne jamais le nom des journaux ou sources” so avoid specific news sources, but for companies in the story, I can rephrase but the company is Figure AI, CEO Brett Adcock, BMW, Nvidia, etc.
The prompt says “Ne mentionne jamais le nom des journaux ou sources spécifiques dans le texte principal.”
So, avoid saying “according to CNBC” etc.
For companies, it’s the subject, so use Figure AI, etc.
To make it 3000 words, I need to expand with analysis, potential impact, future of robotics, safety in AI, education applications, manufacturing, national priority, global competition (China mentioned), investment perspective, etc.
Add personal touch: “What strikes me as particularly exciting is…” etc.
Start with an engaging paragraph, not heading.
Only one H2 near beginning, then H3.
Use WP blocks for all.
The article_content will be a long string with many
Title here
desc
Figure AI
humanoid robot, robotics company, white house event, artificial intelligence, bmw partnership wait, 5 tags, separated by commas.
The prompt says “5 mots-clés (2 mots chacun, ou 1 mot peu commun vraiment lié au sujet), séparés par des virgules, sans #.”
So tag1, tag2, tag3, tag4, tag5
Then kw1, kw2,… up to 15? but says amount=”15″ in example but earlier “7 mots-clés de l’article pour le maillage interne”
The o has the full WP markdown text
❝
Patience is a bitter tree that bears sweet fruit.
— Chinese Proverb
Author
Steven Soarez passionately shares his financial expertise to help everyone better understand and master investing. Contact us for collaboration opportunities or sponsored article inquiries.
Previous
Swan Bitcoin Targets Cantor and Lutnick in Bitter Tether Mining Dispute
Next
US Lawmakers Target Insider Bets on Prediction Markets
Related Articles
Market News
Tesla Q1 Earnings: What Investors Need to Know
Tesla’s Q1 earnings drop today! Will EV sales and Musk’s vision spark a rebound, or is trouble ahead? Click to uncover the key insights!
Apr 22, 2025
7 min read
Market News
Solana Price Nears Breakout Above $143 Resistance
Solana is quietly stacking bullish volume right under that stubborn $143 resistance level. Higher highs, stronger demand, and no real selling pressure in sight... could this tight consolidation finally snap upward?
Jan 12, 2026
5 min read
Altcoins
Amazon Stock Falls on Capex Worries Yet Analysts Remain Bullish
Amazon just reported solid revenue but stunned markets with a massive $200B capex plan for 2026, sending shares down sharply. Investors worry about margins and cash flow, yet top analysts still see major upside ahead. Is this dip a golden buying opportunity or a warning sign?
Feb 6, 2026
7 min read