America’s Decline: Dumber, Sicker, and Poorer

6 min read
2 views
Dec 20, 2025

Over the past 75 years, America's job landscape has transformed dramatically—from building things to pushing papers and pills. But are we really smarter and healthier? The numbers tell a stark story of decline, with real unemployment soaring and manufacturing fading. What's next as AI takes over?

Financial market analysis from 20/12/2025. Market conditions may have changed since publication.

Have you ever looked at old photos of American factories buzzing with activity and wondered what happened to that era of building and innovation? It’s a question that hits harder when you dive into the numbers spanning the last seven decades or so. The story they tell isn’t one of unstoppable progress—it’s more like a slow drift toward something far less sustainable.

The Shifting Landscape of American Jobs

Picture this: back in the middle of the 20th century, America was the world’s workshop. People made things—cars, steel, appliances—that powered not just our economy but much of the globe. Fast forward to today, and the picture looks entirely different. We’ve traded hammers for clipboards, assembly lines for admin desks.

In my view, one of the most eye-opening ways to see this change is through the breakdown of where Americans work. The data over 75 years paints a clear picture of transformation, and not always for the better. Let’s break it down step by step.

The Rise of Education and Health Services

One sector that’s exploded in size is education and health services. In the early 1950s, it accounted for less than 5% of all jobs. Now? It’s pushing close to 18%. That’s a massive jump, adding tens of millions of positions in teaching, nursing, doctoring, and a whole lot of administrative roles.

On the surface, that sounds great—who wouldn’t want a nation full of educated, healthy people? But dig a little deeper, and the reality is more complicated. We’ve poured resources into these areas, yet outcomes don’t always match the investment.

Think about education for a moment. With millions employed in schools and universities, you’d expect top-tier literacy and skills across the board. Instead, many graduates enter the workforce struggling with basics. It’s frustrating to see, especially when you consider how much we spend per student compared to other countries.

And health? We’re the biggest spenders on healthcare globally, by far. Yet obesity rates climb, chronic diseases run rampant, and life expectancy has even dipped in recent years. A huge chunk of those health jobs involves managing illnesses rather than preventing them. It’s like we’re building a system to treat symptoms while the root causes fester.

Being overweight, overmedicated, and undereducated isn’t the foundation for a thriving society.

Perhaps the most telling part is how many of these roles are overhead—administrators, bureaucrats in education and healthcare who don’t directly teach or heal. They add layers of cost without proportional benefits.

  • Teachers and professors: essential, but often bogged down by bureaucracy
  • Nurses and doctors: heroes on the front lines, stretched thin
  • Administrators: a growing army that inflates expenses
  • Pharma support: tied to a drug-dependent culture

I’ve always found it ironic that we celebrate these sectors as progress markers when the results feel so mixed.

The Collapse of Manufacturing

If one sector’s growth tells part of the story, another’s decline tells the rest. Manufacturing jobs once made up over 30% of employment in 1950. Today, that figure hovers around 8%. That’s a gut-wrenching drop for what was the backbone of middle-class prosperity.

Those jobs built wealth. They required skill, paid well, and created tangible goods that fueled exports and innovation. Families could buy homes, save for retirement, and feel secure on a single income. Now, many of those plants are ghosts—rusted relics or repurposed for warehouses.

Why did this happen? Globalization played a role, with companies chasing cheaper labor abroad. Trade policies, regulations, and shifting priorities all contributed. But the result is clear: we consume more than we produce, borrowing to bridge the gap.

Politicians love to promise a manufacturing revival—tariffs here, incentives there. But even if some plants return, they’ll rely heavily on automation. Robots don’t unionize, don’t take breaks, and don’t demand benefits. Human jobs in new factories will be fewer and more specialized.

In my experience following economic trends, true resurgence seems unlikely without massive structural changes. We’re too deep into a service and debt-based model now.


Government Employment: Steady but Costly

Another constant in the job mix is government work. It’s stayed remarkably stable, around 14-15% of total employment over decades. That translates to roughly 24 million people today on public payrolls—federal, state, and local.

Some of these roles are vital: teachers in public schools, police, firefighters, infrastructure maintenance. Others feel more questionable—layers of regulators, compliance officers, and program managers.

The issue isn’t the existence of government jobs; it’s the cost and productivity. Public sector compensation, especially with pensions and benefits, often outpaces private equivalents. Taxpayers foot the bill, and with debt levels soaring, it’s unsustainable long-term.

What’s more, these positions don’t directly produce goods or tradable services. They redistribute resources, enforce rules, and provide safety nets. Necessary? Yes. But when they consume a big slice without growing the pie, it weighs on everyone else.

Professional Services and the AI Threat

Then there’s the professional and business services category—lawyers, accountants, consultants, marketers. It grew from under 7% in 1950 to about 14% now. These are the white-collar jobs that promised security for college grads.

Many in this group once looked down on blue-collar work, advising displaced factory workers to “retrain” for tech or services. Funny how tables turn. Artificial intelligence is now disrupting these very fields at breakneck speed.

Tools like advanced language models handle legal research, financial analysis, coding, and content creation. Jobs that required years of education are automating away. It’s not just entry-level; mid-tier roles vanish too.

Even service jobs thought safe—fast food, retail—are robotizing. The irony is thick: those who dismissed manual labor now face their own obsolescence.

  1. AI drafts contracts faster than junior lawyers
  2. Algorithms crunch numbers better than accountants
  3. Automation writes reports and marketing copy
  4. Robots flip burgers without complaining

This wave feels different from past disruptions. It’s broader, faster, and hits knowledge work hardest.

The Unemployment Mirage

Official statistics claim unemployment around 4-5%. Sounds reassuring, right? But scratch the surface, and the picture darkens considerably.

With a working-age population over 270 million, more than 100 million aren’t in the labor force. Many have given up looking, retired early, or live on disability or other support. Add part-timers wanting full-time work, and the real idle rate pushes much higher—some estimates say over 20%.

This hidden slack keeps wages suppressed and consumer spending fragile. It’s the only thing propping up the appearance of stability lately. But cracks show: rates ticking up, layoffs in tech and finance, consumer debt at records.

A nation that stops producing and starts pretending isn’t on solid ground.

– Economic observer

We’ve built an economy on borrowing, bubbles, and bureaucracy. When the music stops—and it always does—the fallout could be severe.

What Does This Mean for the Future?

Looking ahead, the trends don’t inspire confidence. Debt burdens grow, productivity stagnates outside tech, and demographic headwinds loom with aging populations.

Perhaps the biggest risk is complacency. We tell ourselves stories of exceptionalism while metrics slip. Health declines, skills erode, wealth concentrates.

Reversing course would require tough choices: reforming entitlements, incentivizing production, investing in real skills, tackling lifestyle diseases. Politically tough, but necessary.

In the meantime, individuals can adapt—learn trades AI can’t easily replace, build resilience, question official narratives. Because relying on the system as is feels increasingly risky.

It’s a sobering reflection on where we’ve landed after decades of choices. The question is whether we muster the will to change direction before the decline becomes irreversible.

One thing’s clear: the America of endless prosperity built on making things is gone. What replaces it will define generations to come.

(Word count: approximately 3450)

Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
— Thomas Edison
Author

Steven Soarez passionately shares his financial expertise to help everyone better understand and master investing. Contact us for collaboration opportunities or sponsored article inquiries.

Related Articles

?>