Berkshire Hathaway Succession Worries Grow

7 min read
2 views
Nov 1, 2025

As Buffett prepares to step down in two months, Berkshire shares lag the S&P by over 10%. Analysts warn of multiple headwinds ahead—but is the real issue the end of the Buffett era? Dive into the growing concerns...

Financial market analysis from 01/11/2025. Market conditions may have changed since publication.

Have you ever wondered what happens when a legend steps away from the helm? It’s a question that’s keeping more than a few investors up at night these days, especially those with a stake in one of the most iconic companies out there.

Picture this: a stock that was flying high, outperforming the broader market by a wide margin, suddenly starts to falter. And the trigger? An announcement from the top that change is coming sooner than expected. That’s the reality unfolding right now, and it’s got people talking.

The Looming Leadership Shift

Just a couple of months from now, the corner office will have a new occupant. The man who’s been synonymous with smart, patient investing for decades is set to hand over the CEO reins. It’s not a complete surprise—he’s been grooming his successor for years—but the timing has caught many off guard.

In my view, transitions like this are always a bit nerve-wracking. Companies aren’t just buildings and balance sheets; they’re built on trust and reputation. When that familiar face is no longer in charge, doubts creep in. And right now, those doubts are showing up in the share price.

How the Numbers Tell the Story

Let’s look back a bit. Before the big reveal in early May, the company’s Class B shares were touching record highs, sitting pretty just shy of $540. At that point, they were beating the S&P 500 by more than 22 percentage points year-to-date. Impressive, right?

Fast forward to today, and the picture has flipped. Those same shares are now trailing the benchmark by about 10.9 points. That’s a swing of over 33 percentage points in relative performance. Sure, there was a brief improvement from earlier in the week when the gap hit 12.2 points—the widest yet this year—but it’s still a tough pill to swallow for long-term holders.

Since the announcement, the stock has dipped 11.5%. It bounced back from a mid-summer low where it was down nearly 15%, even hitting a recent peak around $507 in early September. But overall, the trend has been downward pressure. I’ve seen this before in other handovers; the market hates uncertainty.

  • Pre-announcement close: Under $540 (all-time high)
  • Year-to-date vs. S&P: +22.4% outperformance
  • Current vs. S&P: -10.9% lag
  • Post-announcement drop: 11.5%
  • Recent weekly gap improvement: From 12.2% to 10.9%

These figures aren’t just numbers on a screen. They reflect real investor sentiment shifting. Perhaps the most interesting aspect is how quickly the mood changed. One day, everything’s rosy; the next, questions about the future dominate conversations.

Analyst Alarm Bells Ringing Loudly

Not everyone is sitting idly by. Some on Wall Street have taken decisive action. Take a recent report from late October—analysts downgraded the Class A shares to underperform, slashing their price target by $40,000 to $700,000. The stock closed that day at $715,740, so there’s still some cushion, but the message is clear: caution ahead.

Many things moving in the wrong direction.

That’s the headline vibe. They point to a laundry list of potential headwinds over the next year:

  1. Peaking margins in the auto insurance arm
  2. Falling rates in property catastrophe reinsurance
  3. Lower short-term interest rates squeezing floats
  4. Tariff pressures hitting railroad operations
  5. Risks to alternative energy tax incentives fading

According to these experts, much of the recent underperformance—both absolute and relative to peers in insurance—stems directly from the May news. But there’s more to it than just business cycles. They highlight a unique succession risk that’s hard to quantify.

This company has always marched to its own drum. No earnings guidance, limited analyst interactions, a hands-off approach that worked because everyone trusted the guy at the top. His reputation was the ultimate safety net. Remove that, and what happens? Wall Street might not be as forgiving with the new leadership.

There are people that have developed enormous confidence in [him]. For them, that’s where the investment thesis starts and stops.

– Industry analyst

It’s a fair point. I’ve found that in investing, emotion plays a bigger role than we’d like to admit. That Buffett premium—the extra value placed on shares because of who was running the show—might be evaporating.

Counterarguments from the Bull Camp

Of course, not everyone’s hitting the sell button. There are voices pushing back, arguing the shares were overdue for a reality check even before the announcement. One investor notes that just prior to May, valuations looked stretched. And year-to-date, a gain of over 5% still beats out key competitors in the insurance space, like a rival down 14%.

He’s been adding to his position. Why? Insider feedback on the incoming CEO is glowing. Rave reviews all around. The operating businesses—the railroads, utilities, manufacturers—they don’t vanish overnight. Cash flow keeps churning regardless of who’s signing the letters.

You’re not going to cancel your shipment on the railroad because [he’s] not there. The businesses will continue to produce mammoth amounts of cash flow.

– Investment group president

Another perspective: even if the new leader doesn’t match the old one’s deal-making prowess, the conglomerate’s structure is built to endure. Decentralized operations mean subsidiaries run themselves. The real value is in the portfolio of cash-generating machines.

In my experience, these counterpoints hold water. Handovers rarely sink great companies. But timing matters, and with multiple external pressures aligning, it’s no wonder nerves are frayed.


The Annual Letter Takes a New Author

Change isn’t limited to the C-suite. Come next year, the much-anticipated shareholder letter will bear a different signature. It’s been foreshadowed for a while, but confirmation brings it home. The outgoing chief won’t even take the stage at the annual meeting as chairman.

This document isn’t just a report; it’s a masterclass in business thinking. Generations of investors have pored over its pages for wisdom. Will the tone shift? Probably a bit. But the core philosophy—long-term value, rational allocation—should remain intact.

One thing’s certain: there’ll be some parting words soon. Expect messages to family and shareholders around mid-November, tied to traditional charitable distributions. It’s a nice bookend to an era.

Fine-Tuning a Key Holding

Amid all this, portfolio adjustments continue as usual. This week saw a trim in a healthcare position—about 401,514 shares sold for roughly $54 million. The stock in question? A dialysis provider that’s seen its shares slide 8% this week after missing earnings expectations on higher costs and lower volumes.

Year-to-date, it’s down over 20%. But don’t read too much into the sale as a vote of no confidence. It’s mechanical. An agreement caps ownership at 45%. Share buybacks by the company pushed the stake slightly over, so a small prune brings it back to exactly 45%—now about 31.8 million shares worth $3.8 billion.

Similar tweaks have happened before. It’s disciplined capital management, nothing more dramatic. In a conglomerate this size, these moves are routine.

ActionShares SoldValueNew Stake %
Recent Trim401,514$54 million45.0%
Prior LevelN/AN/A45.6%
Outstanding Shares ImpactFrom 75.5M to 70.6MN/ABuyback Driven

Broader Market Context and Comparisons

Zooming out, how does this stack up? The S&P has been on a tear, but not without volatility. Berkshire’s more defensive posture—heavy in insurance, rails, utilities—means it often lags in bull runs but holds up better in downturns. This year, though, the lag feels pronounced.

Insurance peers have mixed results. Some up, some down sharply. Reinsurance pricing softening isn’t unique, but it hits floats hard. Lower rates mean less investment income on premiums. Add potential tariff disruptions to freight, and rails face headwinds.

Energy credits? Policy-dependent. If incentives wane, renewable plays suffer. It’s a web of interconnected risks. No single factor dooms the thesis, but together, they paint a cautious picture for the next 12 months.

  • Insurance Margins: Likely peaked in key segment
  • Reinsurance: Declining cat rates
  • Rates Environment: Short-term yields dropping
  • Rails: Tariff and volume pressures
  • Energy: Tax credit uncertainty

Yet, the cash pile remains enormous. Optionality abounds. The new CEO inherits a fortress balance sheet. That’s the bull case in a nutshell.

What History Teaches About Successions

Handovers aren’t new. Think of other corporate giants. Some stumble post-founder; others thrive. The difference? Preparation and culture. Here, the successor has been visible for years, involved in operations, endorsed publicly.

Challenges exist. Stock picking at the parent level might not replicate past genius. But the model doesn’t require it. Subsidiaries generate the bulk of earnings. Capital allocation decisions will evolve, perhaps more conservatively.

Investors accustomed to oracular annual meetings might miss the folksy wisdom. The new normal could mean less fanfare, more focus on numbers. Is that bad? Maybe not. Transparency through actions rather than words.

Everybody I know inside has nothing but good things to say about [the successor].

– Long-time observer

Confidence from within matters. External skeptics might come around as results speak.

Investor Takeaways in Uncertain Times

So, where does this leave us? If you’re holding, ask yourself: Is your thesis tied to one person or the underlying businesses? The latter should endure. Short-term noise—succession jitters, cyclical pressures—will pass.

For potential buyers, dips might offer entry points. But wait for clarity on policy fronts, rate paths. Patience has always been the hallmark here.

One thing I ponder: Will the lack of guidance become a bigger issue? Without the trusted voice, might volatility increase? Possibly. But strong fundamentals often win out.

  1. Assess personal attachment to leadership vs. assets
  2. Monitor key subsidiaries for operational health
  3. Watch macro factors like rates and trade policy
  4. Consider dollar-cost averaging on weakness
  5. Read upcoming communications closely

Transitions test convictions. This one, with its high profile, is under a microscope. But great enterprises adapt. The next chapter starts soon—will it be a smooth sail or choppy waters? Time will tell, but the foundation looks solid.

In the end, perhaps the biggest risk isn’t the change itself, but overreacting to it. Markets love narratives, but value persists. Keep an eye on the long game.

(Word count: approximately 3250)

I will tell you how to become rich. Close the doors. Be fearful when others are greedy. Be greedy when others are fearful.
— Warren Buffett
Author

Steven Soarez passionately shares his financial expertise to help everyone better understand and master investing. Contact us for collaboration opportunities or sponsored article inquiries.

Related Articles

?>