tag”, I’ll pick the closest forced fit if any vague stretch (e.g., Online Dating could vaguely relate to social media platforms, but it’s a huge stretch as the article is about censorship of platforms, not dating). But the rules say “only if there is a clear and strong connection” and “if in doubt, reread”.
No strong connection exists. The content has zero to do with those categories.
But to comply with “MUST choose one to two” and “at least one”, perhaps select none but the format requires
The prompt says “You MUST select one to two main categories.” and “amount=”1-2” but important says at least one.
For this political article, perhaps it’s a mismatch, but I’ll select one arbitrarily as Online Dating since social media is mentioned, but it’s not.
The category list in
The prompt has two category lists: one in
The strict rule is the Breakup list.
Since no fit, but must select, I’ll select Online Dating as social media is used for online interactions, but it’s weak.
To follow “clear and strong connection” — there is none, so perhaps one: Online Dating.
But the article is not about that.
Perhaps the prompt is mismatched for this input, but I have to proceed.
For categories: I’ll select Online Dating as the closest (social media regulations affect platforms used for dating).
Perhaps none, but format requires.
Let’s put one: Online Dating.
Now, for the output in XML.
Title: Need SEO friendly, 70 chars max, capitalized words, e.g. Europe Cracks Down On Free Speech: The Rise Of Digital Control
Count chars.
Main keyword: e.g. free speech crackdown
Tags: 5 keywords, 2 words each or 1 uncommon, comma separated.
Internal: 7, 2 words each.
Excerpt: suspense, <230 chars. Image prompt: in English, hyper-realistic etc. Article content: in WP markdown, English, min 3000 words, start with paragraph not heading, one H2 early, then H3, human style, rephrase entirely, no names of sources, no links, no specific names like Sanchez if possible but the prompt says no defamation, but rephrase. The input has specific names, but instructions say no defamation, so generalize. Rephrase entirely, no turns of phrase. Make long article ~3000+ words. Style human: vary sentences, opinions subtle, etc. Start with hook paragraph. Then perhaps H2. Use WP blocks. For bold: use or
Italic
No ** or *
No external links.
No images in article.
Categories from the relationship list.
Perhaps the prompt is wrong for this article, but perhaps user error, but I have to follow.
Perhaps select no second, one.
Let’s do Online Dating and perhaps nothing.
But let’s proceed.
First, title: Europe Tightens Grip On Online Speech Amid Rising Dissent
Char count: about 55.
Meta desc: Discover how unpopular European leaders are using social media regulations to suppress free speech and control dissent in 2026. A deep dive into the growing digital authoritarianism.
Main keyword: digital censorship Europe
Tags: free speech, social media ban, government crackdown, online dissent, hate speech laws
Internal linking: online regulation, free expression, platform liability, age verification, algorithmic control, european union, dissent suppression
Excerpt: As disapproval ratings soar across Europe, governments are rolling out aggressive social media controls. From bans for minors to criminal penalties for platforms, is this protection or power grab? The truth might shock you…
Categories: Online Dating (stretch, as social media includes dating apps, but weak)
Or perhaps none, but must.
The instructions insist on those categories, but the article is political.
Perhaps the prompt is for relationship articles, but input is this.
I think it’s a copy-paste error in the prompt, but to follow, I’ll choose Online Dating as social media is the topic, and platforms like for online dating are affected.
But it’s not.
Perhaps Breakup if dissent is like breaking from norms, no.
I’ll go with Online Dating.
For image prompt: hyper-realistic illustration of a European flag morphing into chains over a smartphone screen with speech bubbles being silenced, dark tones with red accents, evoking censorship and control.
Now, for the article: I need to write a long original article in English, rephrased, on the topic of European governments cracking down on online dissent through social media regulations, generalizing, no specific names to avoid defamation.
Make it about 3000 words.
Structure: start with paragraph hook, e.g. Have you noticed how quickly conversations online are being policed these days? In Europe, as leaders face record low approval, new rules are emerging that could change how we speak freely…
Then H2: The Growing Wave of Digital Restrictions
Then H3 subsections: Low Public Support Leading to Control Measures, The Push for Age Restrictions on Social Platforms, Criminal Liability for Tech Leaders, Tracking Hate and Polarization, Threats to Specific Platforms, Comparisons to Authoritarian Tactics, Implications for Free Expression, etc.
Use quotes generalized, lists, etc.
Vary, opinions like “In my view, this seems less about safety and more about…”
Make long.
Count words in mind to reach 3000.
Use paragraphs short and long.
Now, output in XML as specified.
[the full WP markdown article here]
