NFT Sales Surge 67 Percent As Bitcoin Takes Clear Lead

9 min read
2 views
Oct 24, 2026

NFT sales climbed more than 66 percent in a single week and Bitcoin suddenly sits on top. One little-known collection alone moved over 25 million dollars. What changed, and is this the start of something bigger?

Financial market analysis from 24/10/2026. Market conditions may have changed since publication.

Something shifted in the digital collectibles space last week and it caught a few people off guard. NFT sales jumped 66.58 percent to reach 76.56 million dollars over the seven days ending October 24. That is not a modest bounce. It is the kind of move that forces everyone watching the market to sit up and look twice. What makes the number even more interesting is who led the charge. Bitcoin, not Ethereum, took the top spot for blockchain volume. I have followed these weekly tallies for a while now and this kind of reversal still feels surprising every time it happens.

A Clear Jump In Activity Across The Board

The rise was not limited to dollar volume alone. Buyer addresses climbed 46.38 percent to 156,715 while total transactions increased 35.05 percent to 764,169. Seller addresses moved even higher, up 53.09 percent to 135,930. In other words, both sides of the market expanded at the same time. That rarely happens by accident. When more people are willing to buy and more holders are willing to sell, liquidity improves and price discovery becomes cleaner.

Looking at the previous seven-day window, sales sat near 45.96 million dollars. The latest period therefore added roughly 30.6 million dollars in fresh activity. The percentage gain in dollar volume outpaced the gain in transaction count, which usually signals that higher-value pieces changed hands rather than pure volume of low-priced items. In my experience that pattern often appears when a few large transfers or high-profile collections dominate the tape.

At the same time the broader crypto market showed mixed signals. Bitcoin hovered near 80,500 dollars and Ethereum near 2,360 dollars while total market capitalization sat around 2.77 trillion. Spot prices were not exactly roaring higher, yet NFT activity still accelerated. That disconnect is worth noting. Sometimes the collectibles market moves on its own rhythm.

Bitcoin Pulls Ahead With A Dramatic Climb

Bitcoin generated 31.07 million dollars in NFT sales, a staggering 268.06 percent increase from the prior week. Buyer addresses on the network rose 86.79 percent to 8,581. The chain accounted for roughly 40.6 percent of all global NFT volume. Its lead over Ethereum reached about 6.43 million dollars, and together the two networks represented nearly 73 percent of the weekly total.

Only a week earlier Bitcoin sat in third place with just 8.25 million dollars. Ethereum had led the rankings then. The sudden leap feels significant. Part of the explanation sits with a single BRC-20 collection that alone moved more than 25 million dollars. When one project can swing the entire network ranking that hard, concentration risk becomes obvious. Still, concentration also shows where attention and capital are flowing right now.

Wash-trading volume on Bitcoin stayed relatively modest at just over 105,000 dollars according to the data providers that track these figures. That low number gives the headline sales figure a bit more credibility. Of course no dashboard catches every form of artificial activity, but the reported wash levels look manageable compared with some other chains.

Ethereum Holds Strong In Second Place

Ethereum recorded 24.64 million dollars in sales, up 32.59 percent. Buyer addresses jumped 67.63 percent to 25,749. Wash trading on the network fell sharply, down 77.71 percent to roughly 365,500 dollars. Lower wash volume alongside rising genuine activity is usually a healthy combination.

Ethereum still hosts many of the most recognizable long-term collections. Bored Ape Yacht Club, CryptoPunks and several high-profile deposit-related projects continue to appear near the top of the leaderboards. The network’s deeper liquidity and established infrastructure keep it relevant even when another chain temporarily posts higher total volume. I tend to view Ethereum as the steady baseline while other chains produce more volatile spikes.

How The Rest Of The Rankings Stacked Up

Polygon finished third with 8.53 million dollars, a modest 2.82 percent gain. Buyer addresses rose 42.15 percent to nearly 39,000. One notable detail: reported wash volume on Polygon exceeded the network’s actual sales figure, reaching more than 19 million dollars. That gap always raises eyebrows and makes the clean sales number harder to interpret at face value.

BNB Chain came in fourth at 3.35 million dollars, down almost 19 percent even though buyer addresses surged 144 percent. Immutable placed fifth with 2.30 million, a 16.7 percent decline. Arbitrum posted the most dramatic percentage jump of any chain, up more than 1,100 percent to just over 2 million dollars. Base and Solana followed with solid gains of 30 percent and 43 percent respectively.

The picture that emerges is one of concentration at the top and selective strength lower down the list. A handful of networks continue to capture the majority of meaningful activity while smaller chains experience large percentage swings on relatively small absolute numbers.


The Collection That Moved The Needle

One Bitcoin BRC-20 collection, listed as $X@AGI, dominated the week with 25.09 million dollars in sales. That single project represented roughly 32.8 percent of all global NFT volume and more than 80 percent of Bitcoin’s total. The activity came from only three transactions involving three buyers and three sellers. Those are not retail numbers. They look like large, deliberate transfers between a very small group of participants.

When a handful of trades can swing the entire weekly ranking, the market is showing its thin spots. High concentration can create impressive headlines while masking the broader participation story. Still, the absolute size of those trades demonstrates that capital remains willing to move into certain Bitcoin-native digital assets when the right opportunity appears.

Courtyard on Polygon ranked second with 7.77 million dollars. Unlike the Bitcoin leader, Courtyard generated massive transaction volume—more than 141,000 trades. That kind of activity looks much closer to genuine secondary market trading. Buyer and seller counts both declined slightly, yet the sheer number of transactions kept the collection near the top of the dollar rankings.

Slipstream V3 Deposit on Ethereum took third place with 7.58 million dollars across 926 transactions. Bored Ape Yacht Club followed with 3.56 million, a strong 192 percent increase. A second Slipstream collection on Arbitrum, another Bitcoin BRC-20 project, CryptoPunks and the Credits collection rounded out the top of the leaderboard.

The Largest Individual Sales Of The Week

Four of the five highest-value individual sales belonged to the same $X@AGI collection. The largest single transaction cleared 14.63 million dollars, settled in more than 175 Bitcoin. The second-largest reached 9.57 million dollars. Both trades occurred roughly three days before the data snapshot. A Bored Ape Yacht Club piece sold for 2.40 million dollars in the only Ethereum entry among the top five. Two more $X@AGI items rounded out the list at just over 1 million and 893,000 dollars respectively.

These numbers are large enough to influence weekly totals on their own. They also highlight how a small number of high-value transfers can reshape the narrative around which chain is “winning” in any given period. One week Bitcoin looks dominant. The next week a cluster of Ethereum blue-chip sales could easily reverse the ranking again.


What The Buyer And Seller Growth Actually Tells Us

Rising buyer and seller counts matter more than pure dollar volume in the long run. More unique addresses participating usually means healthier secondary market conditions. The 46 percent rise in buyers and 53 percent rise in sellers suggest that interest is broadening rather than simply concentrating among the same few wallets.

Of course address counts can be inflated by temporary incentive programs or by users spinning up multiple wallets. Still, the simultaneous expansion on both sides of the market is a constructive signal. Liquidity improves when more people are active, and improved liquidity tends to attract further participation over time.

I have noticed that periods of rising participation often precede more sustained activity, provided the broader market does not suffer a sharp downturn. Whether that pattern holds this time remains to be seen, but the early data points in a positive direction.

Why Bitcoin’s Lead Feels Different This Time

Bitcoin has occupied the top NFT ranking before, usually during short bursts of BRC-20 or Ordinals excitement. What stands out in the latest numbers is the sheer size of the lead and the fact that it arrived while overall market sentiment remained relatively cautious. Spot Bitcoin prices were not setting new highs at the same moment, yet NFT activity on the network exploded.

Perhaps the most interesting aspect is how little of the volume came from broad retail participation. Three buyers and three sellers moved 25 million dollars. That kind of activity feels more institutional or whale-driven than organic secondary trading. It raises the question of whether the current Bitcoin NFT narrative is still in its early, concentrated phase or whether wider adoption will eventually follow.

Ethereum continues to offer deeper and more diverse liquidity across hundreds of collections. Bitcoin’s strength remains more concentrated in a smaller set of high-profile or experimental projects. Both models can coexist, and the market seems to be proving that point week after week.

Wash Trading And Data Quality Concerns

Any discussion of NFT volume has to acknowledge the persistent problem of wash trading. Some networks still show wash figures that exceed reported genuine sales. When that happens the headline number loses reliability. Polygon’s latest reading is a clear example. Bitcoin and Ethereum, by contrast, showed relatively contained wash levels during the period, which helps support the integrity of their reported totals.

Data providers continue to refine their detection methods, yet no system is perfect. Readers should treat any single weekly snapshot as directional rather than absolute truth. The trend of rising participation and the emergence of new high-value transfers still matter even if the precise dollar figures contain some noise.

Looking At The Broader Context

The NFT market has spent much of the past couple of years in a quieter phase after the explosive cycle of 2021 and 2022. Trading venues have consolidated, many speculative collections have faded, and attention has shifted toward utility, gaming and real-world asset experiments. Against that backdrop a 66 percent weekly jump feels noteworthy. It does not automatically signal a new bull market, but it does show that capital and attention can still return quickly when the right catalysts appear.

Bitcoin’s growing role in the NFT conversation also reflects the maturation of Ordinals and BRC-20 infrastructure. What began as an experimental inscription layer has developed into a functioning market with real (if still concentrated) liquidity. Whether that market can broaden beyond a handful of large players will determine how durable Bitcoin’s current lead proves to be.

Ethereum’s steady second-place performance and the continued strength of its blue-chip collections remain important anchors. Many long-term holders and collectors still prefer the security and tooling that the Ethereum ecosystem provides. The competition between chains is healthy as long as it drives innovation rather than pure speculation.

What Collectors And Builders Might Watch Next

Several questions stand out after this latest set of numbers. Will the high-value Bitcoin transfers continue or prove to be one-off events? Can secondary market volume on Bitcoin expand beyond the current small group of participants? Will Ethereum’s more diversified activity reassert leadership in the following weeks? And how will wash-trading levels evolve as detection tools improve?

I also keep an eye on buyer-to-seller ratios and unique address growth. Those metrics often provide earlier signals of changing sentiment than pure dollar volume. The latest period showed healthy expansion on both sides, which is encouraging. Sustained growth in unique participants would be an even stronger confirmation that interest is genuine rather than temporary.

Builders launching new projects may find the current environment more receptive than it was six months ago, especially if they can demonstrate clear utility or cultural resonance. Speculative launches without underlying demand still face an uphill battle. The market has become more selective, and that is probably a net positive for long-term quality.


Putting The Numbers In Perspective

A 76.56 million dollar week remains modest by the standards of the last cycle’s peak. Yet relative to the quieter periods that followed, the increase stands out. More importantly, the simultaneous rise in buyers, sellers and transactions suggests the rebound has some breadth behind it rather than pure price-driven concentration.

Bitcoin’s 268 percent surge and its new position at the top of the rankings will dominate the short-term conversation. Ethereum’s solid second place and the continued relevance of its major collections provide balance. Smaller chains continue to produce occasional standout percentage moves that keep the competitive landscape interesting.

In the end the weekly numbers offer a useful snapshot rather than a complete diagnosis. Markets move in waves. This latest wave favored Bitcoin-native assets and a handful of high-value transfers. The next wave could look entirely different. What matters is that activity is rising again and more addresses are choosing to participate. That combination has historically been a constructive starting point.

Whether the current momentum continues will depend on many factors outside the pure NFT data: broader crypto prices, regulatory clarity, new product launches and shifting cultural attention. For now the tape shows a clear uptick, a surprising leader, and a market that still has the capacity to surprise. Those of us who watch these figures every week will be looking closely at the next seven-day window to see if the gains hold or fade as quickly as they arrived.

The story of digital collectibles remains unfinished. Last week’s numbers simply added another interesting chapter. Bitcoin took the lead for the moment. Ethereum stayed close behind. Participation expanded. And the market reminded everyone that liquidity and attention can return faster than many expect when the right conditions align. That alone makes the latest data worth studying carefully.

❝
With cryptocurrencies, it's a very different game. You're not investing in a product or company. You're investing in the future monetary system.
— Michael Saylor
Author

Steven Soarez passionately shares his financial expertise to help everyone better understand and master investing. Contact us for collaboration opportunities or sponsored article inquiries.

Related Articles

?>