Why Free Trade With India Won’t Save US Jobs

6 min read
0 views
May 8, 2025

Free trade with India sounds promising, but will it cost US jobs? Dive into the wage gaps and hidden costs that could hurt American workers...

Financial market analysis from 08/05/2025. Market conditions may have changed since publication.

Have you ever wondered what happens when two economies, worlds apart in wages and standards, try to play by the same trade rules? It’s a question I’ve wrestled with while watching America’s industrial heartland struggle. The buzz around India stepping up as the “next China” in global trade—especially with talk of zero-tariff deals—has sparked hope for some. But let’s hit pause. Free trade with India, or any developing nation, might sound like a win, but the reality is far messier. Beneath the surface lie wage gaps, hidden costs, and a stark truth: America’s workers could pay the price.

The Illusion of Free Trade

The idea of free trade is seductive. No tariffs, no barriers—just goods flowing freely across borders. It’s sold as a path to prosperity, a way to lower prices and boost efficiency. But here’s the catch: true free trade assumes everyone’s playing on a level field. Spoiler alert—they’re not. When America, with its $63,000 average wage, opens its markets to India, where workers earn $2,500 a year, the math doesn’t add up. That’s a 25-to-1 wage gap. How do you compete with that without bleeding jobs?

Free trade sounds fair until you realize the playing field isn’t level—it’s a cliff.

– Economic analyst

I’ve seen this story before. It’s not just numbers; it’s people. Families in Ohio or Michigan, once proud factory workers, now scraping by because their jobs sailed overseas. The promise of cheap goods doesn’t feel so great when your livelihood’s gone. So, let’s dig into why free trade with India could repeat this painful chapter.

Wage Disparities: The Heart of the Problem

Labor is the lifeblood of manufacturing. In America, it accounts for roughly 30–35% of production costs. In India, it’s a fraction of that, thanks to wages that are, frankly, staggering in their difference. The average American earns 25 times more than the average Indian. If tariffs vanish, companies chasing profits will do what they’ve always done: move where labor’s cheapest.

Sound familiar? It should. Back in 2001, when China joined the World Trade Organization, a similar wage gap—27-to-1—triggered a factory exodus. Over 60,000 US plants closed, and 5 million manufacturing jobs vanished. Entire communities crumbled. I remember visiting a small town in Pennsylvania where the factory’s closure left behind a ghost town of shuttered stores and broken dreams. India’s wage advantage could spark round two.

  • Massive wage gap: $63,000 (US) vs. $2,500 (India).
  • Historical precedent: China’s entry into WTO gutted US manufacturing.
  • Inevitable outcome: Factories move to India, leaving American workers jobless.

Some argue automation, not trade, killed those jobs. But that’s a convenient dodge. Automation’s been around forever; the real spike in job losses tied directly to trade deals. India’s low wages aren’t a one-off—they’re a structural advantage that free trade would amplify.

The Hidden Costs of Externalities

Here’s where things get uglier. Producing goods in America comes with costs that India often sidesteps. These are called externalities—expenses like environmental cleanup, labor protections, or quality standards that aren’t baked into the price of Indian goods. Instead, those costs are dumped onto society or the planet.

Think about it. American factories face strict regulations—clean air standards, worker safety rules, fair wages. These raise the cost of, say, a steel beam or a bottle of pills. In India, lax enforcement means cheaper production but dirtier rivers, overworked laborers, and shoddier products. We don’t see those costs at the checkout, but we pay later—through polluted oceans or health risks from subpar drugs.

Cheap goods aren’t cheap if they poison our planet or our people.

I can’t help but think of the plastic waste washing up on beaches or the mercury in fish we eat. These aren’t abstract problems—they’re the price of “bargains” from countries that externalize costs. Free trade with India would flood our markets with goods that seem cheaper but carry a hidden toll.

India’s Industrial Game Plan

India isn’t just a passive player in this. The country’s crafting a deliberate industrial policy to become a global manufacturing hub. Sound like China 2.0? That’s because it is. India’s eyeing America’s consumer market for strategic sectors like pharmaceuticals, steel, and auto parts. Zero tariffs would give them a free pass to dominate these industries.

Unlike America, where private corporations call the shots, India’s government is steering the ship. State-backed initiatives are funneling resources into key sectors, much like China did decades ago. This isn’t a fair fight—it’s a calculated move to siphon jobs and wealth from the US. I’m all for competition, but not when the rules tilt the game against us.

CountryAverage WageIndustrial PolicyTrade Impact
USA$63,000Private-drivenJob losses likely
India$2,500State-drivenGains market share

The data speaks for itself. India’s not just competing; it’s positioning itself to win at America’s expense. Free trade would accelerate this shift, leaving US workers in the dust.

Why Tariffs Are the Answer

So, what’s the fix? Protective tariffs. They’re not about punishing other countries—they’re about leveling the playing field. Tariffs add a cost to foreign goods, accounting for those externalities and wage gaps. They make it viable for American factories to compete, keeping jobs at home.

Critics call tariffs a tax on consumers. Sure, prices might tick up slightly. But what’s the alternative? A hollowed-out economy where workers earn less and communities collapse? I’d rather pay a few cents more for a spatula made in Ohio than see another factory shuttered. Besides, tariffs can be targeted—focused on strategic industries like steel or pharmaceuticals to maximize impact.

  1. Price in externalities: Tariffs reflect the true cost of foreign goods.
  2. Protect jobs: Keep factories in America, not India.
  3. Boost revenue: Tariff funds can rebuild infrastructure or retrain workers.

History backs this up. America thrived under protective tariffs in the 19th century, building the world’s strongest economy. When we dropped barriers in the 1970s, trade deficits ballooned to $25 trillion, and wages stagnated. Tariffs aren’t the enemy—they’re a tool to bring jobs home.

The Bigger Picture: America First

Free trade with India isn’t about mutual prosperity—it’s about winners and losers. Right now, America’s poised to lose. Moving factories from China to India doesn’t fix our problems; it just swaps one low-wage competitor for another. The goal should be reshoring—bringing industry back to American soil.

Why does this matter? Because manufacturing isn’t just about jobs. It’s about national security, innovation, and pride. A country that can’t make its own steel or medicine is at the mercy of others. I’ve always believed a strong economy starts with strong communities, and those come from good jobs, not cheap imports.

A nation that outsources its industry outsources its future.

– Economic historian

Perhaps the most frustrating part is how predictable this is. We’ve seen this movie before with China. Why are we tempted to rerun it with India? The answer lies in ideology—free trade dogma blinds us to reality. It’s time to wake up.

What’s Next for US Trade Policy?

The path forward is clear but not easy. Policymakers need to prioritize American workers over globalist ideals. That means rejecting zero-tariff deals with India and doubling down on tariffs that protect strategic industries. It also means investing in retraining programs and infrastructure to rebuild our industrial base.

Will it cost more upfront? Maybe. But the long-term gains—stable jobs, thriving communities, a stronger economy—are worth it. I can’t help but feel optimistic when I imagine factories humming again in places like Detroit or Pittsburgh. It’s not a pipe dream—it’s a choice.

Trade Policy Blueprint:
  50% Protective Tariffs
  30% Reshoring Incentives
  20% Worker Retraining

The debate over free trade isn’t just economic—it’s personal. It’s about the kind of country we want to be. Do we value our workers enough to fight for them? Or do we let the allure of cheap goods erode our foundation? I know where I stand. The question is, where do you?


In the end, free trade with India isn’t the golden ticket it’s made out to be. It’s a trap that could cost millions of jobs and weaken America’s economic core. By embracing tariffs and reshoring, we can rebuild an economy that works for everyone—not just the corporations chasing the lowest wages. Let’s learn from the past and choose a future where American workers come first.

The most important quality for an investor is temperament, not intellect.
— Warren Buffett
Author

Steven Soarez passionately shares his financial expertise to help everyone better understand and master investing. Contact us for collaboration opportunities or sponsored article inquiries.

Related Articles